Throckmorton Blowfart Esquire IV, 33° An(archist) ([info]bitches_tyrone) wrote,
@ 2009-02-01 14:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Share this!  Next Entry
Current music:Radical Face - Welcome Home, Son

(w)hole
When you feel there is a hole in you, and act (it is hardly always the case when one is aware of such acting, or even of such feeling) as if it (the hole) is the whole (i.e. inescapable, all consuming) of you, it will never suffice to fill it (be this filling much of one or many things), it must be healed. To fill it, this is only distraction, a vacuum, a black hole; one cannot clean the oceans cup by cup, no matter what with; the source(s) of poison(ing) must be found. Change diet, or more cavities surely are on the way. Awareness is key, and distraction/deception tugs in opposition to that (just as justice often sits in opposition to understanding). Why must we deceive ourselves, with mental sleight of hand? what makes it easier to ignore such poisoning? There are automatic conditioned responses (e.g. thoughts), -- that one needn't reflect, just know otherwise (they are called thoughts, a noun, static, not thinking, the verb, which has been done in the past in this instance. Thought of this variety is not reflection, but condition [a conditioning having already taken place to bypass/override thinking/reflection]). Knowledge without reflection, and you call this truth? What you call your truth I call self-deception. Go against your side, briefly, consider antinomian thought, if but for a moment. I write to ears, but do they hear through all the distraction?
Do you hear that? Surely, it calls again, it beckons, always. Go, go back. It sounds now, that you must return. Follow the noise, and there, there is your breadcrumb trail. Me? I will wander on. That is my destiny, my destination.




(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]square721bt
2009-02-01 11:38 pm UTC (link)
I largely agree, but I have this intuition that you mean to apply this to some case that I won't agree with. That may be my own insecurity; the experience that strong statements are often applied as judgement.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bitches_tyrone
2009-02-01 11:52 pm UTC (link)
It's largely inspired by events last night, and reflection upon them then and today. I'm curious as to what application or to what case, though, not that the above is meant as any type of absolute. Is this something you would call a strong statement? I'm unclear. And when I say judgement I mean, generally, calling something good or evil or bad or whatever, such short circuits how thinking could better function, and gets the result of Arabs=bad, progress=good, for example. It does not question, which disturbs me (which is not to call this bad!). The premises remain invisible, but underlying, ever-present.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]bitches_tyrone
2009-02-01 11:53 pm UTC (link)
additionally, judgement being a refusal to consider from another point. there are laws, us/them, do not violate such.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]square721bt
2009-02-02 08:58 am UTC (link)
I intuited that this was probably somehow related to consumerism or something similar, but I didn't really have a specific case in mind. In general those sorts of discussions make me uncomfortable, because I agree with them ideologically, but I also consume pretty heavily. So.

Anyways, I didn't have anything specific in mind, I just had an intuition that it might be.

In regards to judgements - It's important to remember that Arabs=good and progress=bad are just as much a judgement.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Log in with OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…